Below are the links to the downloads for my Disney parks in RCT2. The downloads can be found at the bottom of each linked page. All custom objects should export normally, but those that don't can be found at this link:. Just click on the slide with the star and start on page 4 for stuff used in my park. I hope ya'll enjoy my work Disneyland, released in 2005/2006, was my first park. It's heavily based on Disneyland Paris and the Magic Kingdom, but elements of all parks can be found in it.

• Open Rct2 Custom Scenarios

Rct3 disney ctr s download. How to build the mainstreet disneyland paris building on rct3. Disneyland paris on the app store. How to get the disneyland paris hotel addon on rct3. Roller coaster tycoon entrance google search. How to make the sleeping beauty castle on rct3. Rct3 parks ii rollercoaster tycoon. Dl big thunder. Re: RCT2 Disney Park Recreations by Nightfire264 at 11/25/08 4:26:34 AM Is the ride you named Top Gun supposed to be Flight Deck and Face/off is supposed to be Invertigo? I live near Paramount Great America, and they have a Top Gun but its an inverted coaster, not suspended swinging, and they also have Invertigo too. I do have a scenario of this. Disneyland Paris Rct2. Interests: RCT, RCT2, RCT3, Disneyland. Places to download Custom Scenery I know alot of people here will have a good idea where everything is. RollerCoaster Tycoon is back! Rct2 demo rct2 maps rct2 disneyland pack objet rct2 magic kingdom rct2 cfr rct2 disneyland pack rct2 rct2 download rct2.

Disneyland took 1 1/2 years to build. DisneySea is my crowning achievement. Released just a few days ago, this park took 3 years to fully complete. Even now I'm considering going back and redoing a few things.

Re: My RCT2 Disneyland & DisneySea I love both these Parks. When I was working with RCT2 I was trying and trying to build Disneyland, but just couldn't do it. I find for me building my own Parks worked best. Then I went up to RCT3 and have been having a ball. But these are great. Disney Seas is really nice. I hope you will add to it and keep posting new photos.

How do get your pictures to open in those separate little windows that you can just move through without having to go back to the main page each time you want to see a new picture. I see a lot of these types of showing pictures and each on is slightly different. I am just curious how it works, or where the site is located that does this for you.

Iceman, what a great park from the screens. I think this is actually really the style of parkmaking I appreciate.

I'll give you a detailed review when downloading is finished. Edit: I must say that I'm not really amazed after viewing it. The screens promise a lot because after seeing them you think: 'Wow, amazing to see how well the park is themed. Let's see how the rides look', but there are nearly no rides in this park. The attraction I like the most are Seven Voyages of Sinbad and Caravan Carousel. I chose a water darkride without a drop and a carousel. Now where are the coasters?

Why didn't the park atleast have something like Flounders Flying Fish Coaster? There are Journey to the Center of Earth and the Indiana Jones Coaster but even if this is Disney Sea i would have expected more. Why not atleast some more flatrides. If I remember right there is not one outdoor ride besides the steamer which was really cool, the Tram and the Venetian Gondolas. The themeing for all three of them is impressive but a park of this sieze can't just have three outdoor rides which are all just for getting a view of the park. Now let's come to a detailed review of the areas: Italy: I was really impressed by the layout of this area. I liked the fact that you managed to put so many HUGE buildings on such a small space but I was quite happy I must say when I finished watching this area.

Even if building so many giant buildings on such a small space is quite impressive it's not really a good point for the park. The area was just way too crowded and though there were so many little details you couldn't really find any because there was just too much going on. Between all the architecture I finally found the Venetian gondolas which were quite nice but I didn't like the color of the boats. The layout of them was good though. USA: After having seen Italy I moved on to the USA which was a lot better. I liked finally finding some more attractions (3) but still it was lacking something.

I thought you needed one main ride per area and there was none in this one. I loved all the ships and the S.S.

Columbia but after having seen your creativity when it comes to the use of objects I would have liked to see creativity in terms of ride design and ride interaction with the path. The trams were fitted very well to the area as the Manhattan Motor Madness ride did but still I can't get over the fact that there is no real main ride. Port Discovery: I liked Aquatopia as I have seen the real one on many screens. I think it's a great ride and it was pulled out very well. Storm rider is good too but it just didn't capture me for too long. There was just not much too experience in this area.

The overall layout of the area is great though and again you showed a great creativity here. Lost River Delta: For me this was the second best area right after the, yet to come, Arabian Coast. I liked seeing Indiana Jones without the roof but what made the two rollercoasters of the park, Indiana Jones and Journey to the Center of the Earth, even worse was that they are not what you expect when you want to see a coaster. Both had one main drop and the rest was just straight and boring in my eyes. Pls don't think I overall didn't like the park but next time just add more and BETTER attractions to it.

The steamer station was great here. I loved the atmosphere you gave this area and I can imagine that it's great in the real disney sea.

Arabian Coast: This was BY FAR the best area in my eyes as there were the two best attractions. Caravan Carousel is a great, a really GREAT carousel. Maybe the best I've seen yet.

I wish there were more attractions of this class all over the park. The same level of greatness had the 7 Voyages of Sinbad.

I loved the indoor theme and especially the area in front of it. The whole area was layouted very well and was the only one which actually really gave me the WOW-factor. The architecture and atmosphere there was just great! Mysterious Island: From the overview it looks really good but even this one didn't hold my attention for too long. I don't really like Journey to the Center of the Earth. Island at the top of the world is just a motion simulator so there's not much to say about this. I don't even know what to write about this area as I'd just write the same as I did when I commented on the other areas.

The areas layout and the idea behind it is great but again it lacks at terms of ride design or just at terms of being interesting. Scandinavian Inlet: I quite liked maelstrom when I first saw it but I was sad when I noticed that the interior of that hall was not themed. The only ride which could have been themed well and have an interesting and thrilling layout with more than one drop was not themed. That was a bad fact about the ride in my eyes but with a bit of imagination I expect it to be a good ride in a real Disney Park. The Overall layout of the park was great but if you had filled that part behind the facades of the USA with the Atlantis ride you wanted to build it would have been SO much better because then there would have been a ride which captures you for some time and as I said your park didn't have any of those. I really think you let the wrong rides out because all those you mentioned in the read me would have been a great adition to the park. Congratulations to the spotlight but please, even if this is a Disney Park, PLEASE put some more rides in your next parks!

Fisch Edited by Fisch, 30 July 2008 - 11:56 AM. Yeah congrats ice (prefer the old name ). I still think your Disneyland Resort should've been Spotlight, but with this park you prove your style is of high quality parkmaking.

I'm also glad to see quality PARKmaking is still alive, and not only those designs and small pieces of RCT which we've been flooded with lately. I'll write some more elaborate review later, but one minor point of critique is the absence of a major rollercoaster (apart from 'journey' of course). Congrats on the parkmaker spot and Spotlight and looking forward to the Studios park!

I'm glad everyones enjoying the park, and im very happy that it won spotlight. I knew that one of the parks 'drawbacks' would be the lack of a major roller coaster.

People may be thinking that i took the cheap way out not having one, but i didnt. From the beginning the park was intended to have a roller coaster in the form of the spark gap electric loop coaster. To be located in port discovery, the coaster would have been a thrilling trip through a lightning-collecting power plant. Up until the final days of construction, a portion of the coaster existed, but i couldnt get the show building and coaster to fit in the space provided.

Im not too upset really about not having a coaster in the park. Tokyo disneysea's only real coaster is raging spirits (not including the mini flying fish one), and that ride is simply an off-the-shelf retheme of disneyland paris' indiana jones and the temple of peril. Somewhere down the line i may go back and redo areas i felt were rushed, and part of that plan is to add in a new highly themed version of dca's paradise pier. Also, journey to the center of the earth and the indiana jones adventure are NOT roller coasters. Their ride systems are impossible to replicate without hacking (which i suck at), so i chose a ride that had similar looking cars to the real things. Again im glad that yall are enjoying the park as much as i did building it. Anyone find any hidden mickeys yet?

First of all - thank you for including a really good Read-Me with the park. It went into a lot of depth of why you built certain things and showed you'd really thought everything through.

It also explained why some things were cut. I think it's a little unfair to criticise the lack of a coaster. Believe me, I am one of those people who loves parks to be ride-focussed. But this clearly is a park which is not trying to be ride-focussed.

Open Rct2 Custom Scenarios

It's a DisneySea park; the aesthetics and theming of this is meant to overshadow the rides. So whilst in some senses it's a shame that there aren't more rides for the viewer to look at, I completely understand why there aren't more rides for the viewer to look. Chucking a random coaster in just for the sake of having a coaster would have been pointless. I mean, if you were making your own version of EPCOT, would people complain because there's no coaster? As much as I think rides should be the focus of RCT, I understand that putting lots of rides in this park would actually be unrealistic - as would building a coaster in an EPCOT-esque park.

There's a compromise between realism and adding lots of rides solely for the benefit of the RCT viewer. As I said, I do very much like parks to be ride-focussed and am always in the 'Rides Theming/Scenery/Architecture' camp.

I like realistic park-making, I like good rides - I generally don't like fantasy. But this isn't really in either ballpark - it's realistic (not fantasy) but isn't ride-dominated. So what you're left with is basically a spectacularly themed map. And I think you've pulled it off stunningly. I completely agree with your comment in the read-me: 'Some complaints were made in the Ad District that some of the facades were 'too bare' or plain. I restate that this is based on a real structure and I'm not going to add details that shouldn't be there. Not all walls in real life are decorated beyond belief.'

You manage to pull off this realistic style of theming incredibly - without making it needlessly over-detailed. Bearing in mind difficulties with the object limit (I know how horrible that can be) and that makes the results even more impressive. I love how each area has its own distinct atmosphere and style. And yet it all works together as a whole park. And how it still does feel Disney-esque.

My favourite area was Lost River Delta - it just feels like such an absorbing part of the park. Glad you removed the roof off a few of the rides - I really liked Manhattan Motor Madness. But the best example of this was the Sinbad ride. It's so hard to make this style of ride (ie. A themed indoor Disney dark ride) work in RCT - but you've pulled it off brilliantly.

There are obviously so many details in this park, I haven't began to explore it all yet, but it's a really impressive showcase of your envisioning of a park. (I've only found two hidden Mickeys lol.) So all in all what am I trying to say? I loved the park, it's well worthy of a spotlight. I completely agree with SixFrags's comment - it's so nice to see some proper parkmaking going on. You've clearly thought everything through very carefully when building this park. It's not a ride-focussed park - whilst that means that all the viewer is looking at is scenery, which is a shame - I do completely appreciate that this isn't really meant to be a ride-dominated park.

What it is is a very realistic, beautiful DisneySea theme park. Congrats, and am looking forward to seeing your Studios park. Congratulations Well, I will check this out as soon as I can but I just want to point out something. When Iceman first started showing off his first Disney park, he was praised for how detailed his buildings are. I haven't been around much in the past year, but I think it is funny that people are now complaining about the lack of detail on his buildings. I guess it really shows how the game has shifted with the smaller and smaller objects.

But I really feel that these small, decorative objects have done more to make the game less realistic than realistic. As this park proves it, the norm is to now construct buildings more elaborately decorative than Disney, which ends up in just a pointless cluster of objects.

Anyway, another argument, another time. I support that this has won Spotlight and I haven't seen it yet. Not all parks have to be IOA, or ROB. I fully support granting an accolade to a park that succeeds in its execution.

From screens, this is not a standard RCT park with your watercoaster, woodie, beemer, and arrow looper/intamin rocket that surrounds a lake. Nor does this park have RCTecture. Congrats and I will check it out tonight.